Post by account_disabled on Feb 20, 2024 5:43:23 GMT -5
But the majority among whom were leaders such as Italo Balbo Dino Grandi and Roberto Farinacci were the children of small local professionals lawyers or even high school teachers. Or as in the case of Renato Ricci a worker in the Carrara marble quarries. For its part the social base of the fascist movement was composed from the beginning of the new middle classes.of those who were active were young people mostly from the Po Valley children of former farmers who had managed to buy land during the period of the great crisis which had lasted between.
These men who had become property owners logically did not want to submit to any socialist system that imposed socialization. We must bear in mind that between and following the disintegration of large capitalist property in Russia Mobile Number List countryside a million new owners were formed that is people who had fought as peasants to have ownership of the land and who did not want to give it up for any proletarian or socialist idea. If we do an exercise and attribute to each of these people a single male child we have a million young people who are against socialism and who having been the majority of these combatants in the Great War and having identified with the nation They saw themselves as the new ruling class. They are the ones who give life to the new fascist squads the fascist leaders and those who will later be the leaders of the fascist regime during the years of government.
Fascism had a worker component but these were agrarian workers who after the destruction of socialist organizations had been forced to join fascist unions with the promise of access to land something that ultimately most of them I wouldnt get. This shows us that the class composition of fascism was very different from that of National Socialism in that it never managed to capture strong support from the working class. While Nazism had important workers support fascism failed to gain that support from the workers except for those of the second generation that is those who had not known squad violence. These were more favorable to fascism as the communist leaders themselves recognized.
These men who had become property owners logically did not want to submit to any socialist system that imposed socialization. We must bear in mind that between and following the disintegration of large capitalist property in Russia Mobile Number List countryside a million new owners were formed that is people who had fought as peasants to have ownership of the land and who did not want to give it up for any proletarian or socialist idea. If we do an exercise and attribute to each of these people a single male child we have a million young people who are against socialism and who having been the majority of these combatants in the Great War and having identified with the nation They saw themselves as the new ruling class. They are the ones who give life to the new fascist squads the fascist leaders and those who will later be the leaders of the fascist regime during the years of government.
Fascism had a worker component but these were agrarian workers who after the destruction of socialist organizations had been forced to join fascist unions with the promise of access to land something that ultimately most of them I wouldnt get. This shows us that the class composition of fascism was very different from that of National Socialism in that it never managed to capture strong support from the working class. While Nazism had important workers support fascism failed to gain that support from the workers except for those of the second generation that is those who had not known squad violence. These were more favorable to fascism as the communist leaders themselves recognized.